So yesterday The front cross member found it's home, today I refilled the old gas bottles and bent and trimmed the frame rails around the cross member. Double checking after all this heating and beating revealed that the frame was still square, measuring 114" from corner to corner. A quick check with a digital level revealed the top edge of the frame is still dead level in every direction. This is how the day started
Ok so this post is a bit out of order but like I said on the opening page it is different from your average blog in that things posted have already happened so the order of posting is a bit flexible. I have been asked to detail more clearly where I deviated from the original Chevrolet design and why. I made some changes for aesthetics and some for more practical reasons. My basic theory comes from examining the cars I really like and trying to figure out why I found them so appealing. Watching an interview with Chip Foose one day he condensed his design theory into a simple form even I could understand. Basically it consists of looking at the overall design and taking away any ugly or distracting parts while improving the overall flow of the vehicle. Anything that stands out as out of place or disturbs the flow of the lines should be fixed. Details should appear only on close examination but should disappear when you ...
All the available literature specifies a 5-7 degree positive angle compared to the frames top line with most recommending 5 degrees so that is what I will use on mine. The question is how to hold the spring mount at 5 degrees, while being sure it is centered on the front tube. So I found the center, double checked that the frame rails were level Then I made sure it was centered and made this contraption to hold it and have it adjustable. Adjusting the angle is as simple as turning the bolt until the angle finder reads 5 degrees. Both the frame and mount angle were double checked with a digital level.
Comments
Post a Comment